Negromonte, minister of cities has resigned over corruption allegations, making this the 7th minister to resign since Dilma Rousseff has taken office in January of 2011.
Mr Negromonte has been accused of awarding public work contracts to companies which financed his party, allegations he denies. -BBC News Latin America and the Caribbean
For more information.
For the final paper incorporating the research previously posted on this blog, please see here.
The funding of the healthcare system tends to be a little complicated and some benefit more than others. The problem is the funding comes from the federal, state and municipalities. The larger states will get more funding than the smaller states so in fact the larger states would have better care and facilities to treat the people than the smaller and more poor states. The percentage of GDP that is spent on SUS is only 3% which is completely not accurate with the amount of people who depend on SUS. Most of the rest of the health GDP is invested in the private sector of health. This leads to a constant competition between the public and private sectors which leads to conflicting goals.
See The Economist. Health Care in Brazil. An Injection of Reality. http://www.economist.com/node/21524879
There also seems to have been corruption within the Ministry of Health. In which funds designated to the SUS wasn’t completely going to the system. Since only a specific percentage has to be recorded the amount that could have been taken out isn’t known. There were also instances where the same doctor was being hired in multiple different specialties instead of just one. The doctors were also found to be charging patients for surgeries or practices that were already covered by SUS. This leads there to be a system of checks and balances needed to be put in place with the health care system.
See Brazil’s SUS National Health Problems by Felicia Bryson in The Rio Times
For all the programs the problem seems to be that there aren’t enough doctors, nurses, clean hospitals, equipment and sanitation in the system. There aren’t enough beds to service the population who rely in the system and the long waits for care at the moment and in the future causes people to at times worsen in their respective conditions. Also, what a doctor makes in providing his work to the public sector he can be making twice as much in the private sector. There is no incentive for any doctor to stay in the public sector of health when they can easily make the switch to the private sector which is growing. The income inequality is especially large in Brazil and more and more people who are rising out of poverty are leaving the system in order for better care in the private side of it. In October of this year there was a massive strike in Rio and 21 other states by the doctors and health professionals in protest against the low pay and poor working conditions. They are protesting that the care that is being provided by the SUS isn’t sufficient for the people and for those who provide it.A federal hospital in Rio also went on strike because of the lack of physicians, other medical professionals and funding being provided. A survey was later conducted and showed that there were many parts of the hospitals that were shut down due to lack professionals working in them.
See The SUS Doctors in Brazil Strike in 21 States and Federal Hospitals to go on Strike in Rio by Brennan Stark in The Rio Times
The Family Health Program is funded by the federal, state and municipal governments. The program’s budget in 2005 was U.S. $1,175 million and the cost per team was U.S. $173,400. Per person this means that each was covered with U.S. $31-$50 depending on the municipality.
See Widening access to healthcare: an evaluation of Brazil’s family Health Programme by Rocha Romero and Rodrigo Soares.
The HIV/AIDS program in 1998 had a budget of U.S. $436 million; the federal government spent roughly U.S. $352 million for treatment; US$42 million for prevention; US$41 million for institutional development; and US $1 million for surveillance. In 2000, treatment still represented the largest component of the budget with the antiretroviral drug taking the biggest share of the budget for treatment
See HIV/AIDS in Brazil by the AIDS Policy Research Center, University of California San Francisco
Health expenditure is 9% of GDP according to the World Bank. Only 3% of GDP is for the public spending on health. The spending per inhabitant in Brazil in 2007 was $ 715 in U.S. dollars and the budget for 2010 was R$62.5 billion which had increased 4.5% from the previous year.
Brazil’s federal, state and local governments all come together to raise funds. It derives two thirds from the public sector and one third from the private sector. The government derives money from the Social Security budget which is predominately based on contributions and taxed from employee payroll and business profits. State and local governments have also been mandated to increase their spending on health until it reaches 12% and 15% of their respective budgets.
See Health Reform in Brazil: Lessons to Consider by PhD. Elias, M. Eduardo Paulo and PhD. Cohn, Amelia Amelia Cohn PhD and Paulo Eduardo M. Elias PhD. Also see Access to and Financing of Health Care in Brazil by the Associacao da Industria Farmaceutica de Pesquisa.
The mortality rate began to decline and by 2002, the Ministry of Health had determined that due to the availability of the drug it had prevented around 358,000 HIV-related hospitalizations. By 2008, it was estimated that almost 200,000 people living with HIV were receiving the antiretroviral drugs. The extent of the success of the program in Brazil can be taken into consideration with the fact that the World Bank had stated that 1.2 million people in Brazil would be infected with HIV/AIDS by the year 2000 and in reality there were 600,000 people infected.